Legal Opinion

State v. Highley

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 26, 2008No. CR050560; A130716PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), and appeals his conviction, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Defendant also raises an evidentiary issue in a supplemental assignment of error. As explained below, we conclude that defendant was stopped unlawfully and that the evidence that he sought to suppress was gained as a result of that unlawful stop. Accordingly, we reverse and remand on that basis and do not reach defendant’s supplemental assignment of error.

On review of the denial of a motion to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. HighleyOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. La FranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. RadtkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API