State v. Highley
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
Defendant was convicted of possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), and appeals his conviction, assigning error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. Defendant also raises an evidentiary issue in a supplemental assignment of error. As explained below, we conclude that defendant was stopped unlawfully and that the evidence that he sought to suppress was gained as a result of that unlawful stop. Accordingly, we reverse and remand on that basis and do not reach defendant’s supplemental assignment of error.
On review of the denial of a motion to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ValdezOregon Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. HighleyOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. La FranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. AylesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. RadtkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.