Legal Opinion

State v. Broughton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2008No. C042323CR; A128177PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance, Schedule II (methamphet amine), former ORS 475.992 (2003). Defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of her motion to suppress evidence obtained during searches of her car and of her person. She argues that her consent to the searches was unlawfully obtained because it occurred during the impermissible extension of what began as a lawful traffic stop, but became an unlawful seizure because the police officers who conducted the searches lacked objective reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. AmayaOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. AmayaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. BertschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  2. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. State v. BarberMarion County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. HuggettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. BlackstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API