Legal Opinion

State v. Holmes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 1991No. TC CR89-87, M89-69; CA A60910; SC S37239PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

This is yet another case in which this court is called on to decide whether police action constitutes a “seizure” of a person within the meaning of Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution 1 and the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. 2 Specifically, the issue is: Does a law enforcement officer who positions himself about one-half mile from a motor vehicle accident and who stops a motorist on a public highway for the purpose of advising the motorist of a detour around the accident “seize” the person of the motorist within the meaning of those constitutional…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. MatosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API