Legal Opinion

State v. Parker

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 11, 2009No. 0606-47424; A134163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIiaselton, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, ORS 166.240(1), assigning error to the trial court’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress evidence. Defendant argues that his consent, and, consequently, the discovery of the evidence, derived from a violation of his right under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution 1 to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. 2 We conclude that the encounter may have been unlawful, depending on facts that neither party developed at trial, and that the encounter did lead to discovery of the evidence. In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. MacPherson v. Department of Administrative ServicesOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. AshbaughCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. State v. LantzschCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. KhoshnawCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API