Legal Opinion

Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of America

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1937No. 26507. Department OnePublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

This action was instituted for recovery on a burglary insurance policy on a safe and its contents. Trial of the cause to a court and a jury resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount for which it prayed. Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted, and judgment of dismissal entered. Plaintiff appealed.

On September 29, 1934, appellant, a domestic corporation, commenced business as a cash department store in Seattle. Mark T. Shaw, its vice-president, was charged with the duty of obtaining insurance protection for appellant. On September 28, 1934, when…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lipman v. Niagara Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Sherri v. National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Sherman v. SweenyWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Perry v. Continental Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Lloyd's of LondonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Spence v. Washington National InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943
  4. Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BechardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1963

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API