Legal Opinion

Spence v. Washington National Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 10, 1943PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bristow

Fay Spence, in a trial before the court without a jury, obtained a judgment for $1,000 against Washington National Insurance Company, defendant and appellant. The suit was by plaintiff as beneficiary under an accident policy issued by defendant to Willie Spence, husband of plaintiff. The husband was killed as a result of his Ford truck, in which he was riding, colliding with another car.

Willie Spence made application for membership in the Auto Club of Egypt. This was a nonprofit organization for motorists which furnished its members road service, towing and wrecking service, maps, guides,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Feder v. Midland Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Home Ins. Co. of New York v. Campbell Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Keistler Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  5. Pressley v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Pennell v. United InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. BidwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. FilosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. English v. Old American Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  5. Jennings v. Bituminous Casualty Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1964

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API