Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Chief Justice:
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit presents us with two certified questions involving the application of the doctrines of waiver and estoppel when an insurer has initially stated one reason for denying coverage to its insured and, in subsequent litigation, has attempted to assert another, previously unarticulated reason for denying coverage. We conclude that, in order to establish that an insurer has impliedly-waived its right to assert a previously unar-ticulated reason for denying coverage, the insured must show that the insurer intentionally…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited67 opinions
- Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Intel Corporation v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. ButlerWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- National Mutual Insurance v. McMahon & Sons, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- West Virginia Fire & Casualty Co. v. StanleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
- Enoka v. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Creveling v. Government Employees InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- EXECUTIVE RISK INDEMNITY, INC. v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.