Legal Opinion

Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1906No. 6050PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Kennan, J., entered October 14, 1905, in favor of the defendants, on the pleadings, in an action to restrain the construction of a grade or fill by a railroad company.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, J.

The complaint in this case contains two causes of action. • As a first cause of action it alleges, in substance, that the defendant Spokane & Inland Railway Company is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of this state, and is so organized for the .purpose of constructing and operating a steam and electric railway between the city of Spokane in this state and the city of Moscow in the. state of Idaho-; that the plaintiffs are the owners in fee of the S. E. % of the S. E % of Sec. 14, Tp. 24, 1ST., R. 43, E. W. M., Spokane county;

“That early in the spring of 1905, the said…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Samson v. BealeWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Walker v. EbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Washington Central Improvement Co. v. NewlandsWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Nebeker v. CutsingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Sherman v. SweenyWashington Supreme Court · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Good v. First Nat. Bank of RoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Perry v. Continental Insurance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Gerard-Fillio Co. v. McNairWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Johnston v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1919

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API