Legal Opinion

Perry v. Continental Insurance Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1934No. 24797. En BancPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

Rose M. Bunch Perry, who resided in Grays Harbor county, owned a dwelling house on Guemes Island, about one and one-half miles north of Anacortes. On June 30, 1931, while on a visit to the island for the purpose of having the house repaired, she called at the office of defendant insurance company’s agents and made a signed, written application for a policy of fire insurance, expiring June 30, 1934, to cover that dwelling. The policy was issued and mailed to her at Grays Harbor county two or three weeks afterward. A copy of the written application was attached to the policy. The application…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hubenthal v. Spokane & Inland Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Day v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hayes v. Automobile Insurance ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Hayes v. Automobile Insurance ExchangeWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Michak v. Transnation Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Michak v. Transnation Title Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Barber v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Skagit State Bank v. RasmussenWashington Supreme Court · 1987

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API