Legal Opinion
Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rose
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1963No. 36668PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ryan, J †
The appellant, Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Company, brought this action for a declaratory judgment to determine its liability or duty under a policy of automobile insurance which had been issued to the respondent, Ralph M. Rose, by its predecessor, the Mayflower Insurance Exchange.
The trial court found that in 1958 respondent Ralph M. Rose consulted one Ronald Smith, an insurance agent for appellant’s predecessor company, with offices in Snoqual-mie, Washington. As a result of this conference, a policy of automobile insurance upon a 1956 Plymouth automobile, then owned by Mr.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Nielson v. BentonAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Carew, Shaw & Bernasconi, Inc. v. General Casualty Co. of AmericaWashington Supreme Court · 1937
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Kremers-Urban Co. v. American Employers Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Daniel Kimbro, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Atlantic Richfield Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Fritz v. GortonWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Seattle Professional Engineering Employees Ass'n v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2000
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.