Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Gilbert

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1958No. 177PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The appellant poses three questions on this appeal:

1. Was the plaintiff entitled to judgment on the pleadings?

2. Is the plaintiff the owner of and entitled to the immediate possession of the property described in the complaint?

3. Is the defendant entitled to a lien on the property described in the complaint to the extent of $2,690.85 for moneys expended by him for doctor, medical, hospital and funeral expenses on behalf of and for Herbert H. Stanley, life-tenant and only son of Edward R. Stanley?

As we construe the record before us, there is no controversy between the parties with respect to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. City of Raleigh v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. FrazelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Pridgen v. . PridgenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Smith v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Poindexter v. WACHOVIA BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  2. Herring v. Volume Merchandise, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. McRorie v. CreswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Wells v. Planters National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API