First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Frazelle
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.
This appeal presents four questions for our determination. 1. Was the option to purchase the premises described in the lease, in effect when the plaintiff notified the defendants of its election to purchase the property? 2. Did the failure of U. W. Mills to expressly bind his heirs and assigns in the lease, make its terms unenforceable against bis sole surviving beir ? 3. Did payment of tbe rent to tbe personal representative of U. W. Mills and not to tbe beir at law, from 1941 until tbe institution of tbis action, invalidate tbe lease? 4. "Was tender of tbe purchase price necessary under tbe…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Monger v. . LutterlohSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Ward v. . AlbertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Thomason v. . BescherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Cunningham v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Texaco, Inc. v. CreelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Sisco v. RotenbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co., N.A. v. RubishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Reynolds v. EarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.