Legal Opinion

McRorie v. Creswell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1968No. 602PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

The controversy between the parties to this action involves the interpretation of the will of George M. Misenheimer (testator). The pleadings raise no issue of fact on any material proposition. Thus, the rights of the parties must be determined as a matter of law on the undisputed facts contained therein. Phillips v. Gilbert, 248 N.C. 183, 102 S.E. 2d 771. It follows, therefore, that the trial court was empowered to render its judgment upon the pleadings. 3 Strong, N. C. Index, Pleadings § 30 (I960).

The trial court based its decision upon the following rationale: Testator devised to Rosanna…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Whitfield v. Garris.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Hampton v. GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  3. Hauser v. Craft.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Hampton v. . GriggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  5. Finch v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McRorie v. QueryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  2. White v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. White v. LackeyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  4. McRorie v. ShinnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  5. In Re the Will of AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API