Wells v. Planters National Bank & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.
In entering his declaratory judgment Judge Mintz noted that the action involved two controversies: the first, between the plaintiff remaindermen and defendant Bank as ancillary administrator of the life tenant, Pearl K. Wells, over certain rents and expenses for 1962; the second, between one of the plaintiffs, R. S. Wells, and defendant Bank as trustee as to what estate he takes in the remainder of the .corpus of the Pearl K. Wells Trust. Judge Mintz recognized that there is a misjoinder of parties and causes. His judgment recites that to this misjoinder “no objection has been raised in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- First-Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. FrazelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Benton v. . BaucomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- In Re the Estate of GallowaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- Hicks v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- King v. . FoscueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wells v. PLANTERS NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965