WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. Taylor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.
The appellants contend that the court erred “in concluding and adjudging that the devise of the remainder interest in the real property to the children of Alice Lee Taylor McLeod and Martha Anne Taylor Swayze was in violation of the rule against perpetuities and therefore void.”
There is no appeal from the court’s interpretation of the will with nrespect to the disposition of personal property. The judgment below as to the personal estate is binding on all parties and this phase of the case is not considered and discussed here. Rule 28, Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 562.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bowen v. Hackney.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- McPherson v. First & Citizens National Bank of Elizabeth CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Carter v. KemptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Wachovia Bank & Trust Co. v. SchneiderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Parker v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Key v. Wagner Woodcraft, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- Joyner v. DuncanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Baxter v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- WACHOVIA BANK & TRUST COMPANY v. DodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Starling v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.