Herring v. Volume Merchandise, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
The court has authority to decide issues of law raised by the pleadings, but when the pleadings present disputed factual questions a party who has not waived his rights is entitled to have a jury decide the controversy. G.S. 1-172. Phillips v. Gilbert, 248 N.C. 183, 102 S.E. 2d 771; Erickson v. Starling, 235 N.C. 643, 71 S.E. 2d 384.
Pleadings must be liberally construed to permit substantial justice between the parties. G.S. 1-151. We examine the pleadings and the law with this -injunction in mind.
Plaintiffs sued Volume Merchandise, Inc. in December 1956. The complaint then filed merely…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Erickson v. StarlingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Dobias v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Davis v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Faw v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Earline Waddle v. Lorene B. ElrodTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- Mosley & Mosley Builders, Inc. v. Landin Ltd.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Kline v. LightmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Daniel Boone Complex, Inc. v. FurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Kent v. HumphriesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.