Legal Opinion

Erickson v. State

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 21, 1999No. C7-99-574PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge.

Respondent Jeffrey Erickson sued the State of Minnesota and Lenny Lang, a state department of natural resources employee, for injuries he sustained when Lang’s truck collided with his truck on a public logging road.

The state claimed immunity from tort liability under the logging road exception in Minn.Stat. § 3.736, subd. 3(p) (1998), and moved for summary judgment. The district court ruled that the exception applies only to losses caused by the unstable condition of the road and not to negligent acts committed on the road. The state appealed the district court’s denial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hibbing Education Ass'n v. Public Employment Relations BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Wegener v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Homart Development Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Anker v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Schiff v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Stewart v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  3. All Metro Supply, Inc. v. WarnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, (A14-132), (A14-224) v. Angela Mary Lennartson, (A14-132), Katie Foss, (A14-224).Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  5. Stewart v. KoenigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API