Legal Opinion
Homart Development Co. v. County of Hennepin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 3, 1995No. C0-94-2485PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, Justice.
This case comes to us on certiorari to the Minnesota Tax Court. Relator, Homart Development Co., challenged the 1991 and 1992 assessments of the market value for its real property located in Bloomington, Minnesota. Pursuant to the statute which establishes the procedure for the prehearing exchange of appraisals in property tax cases, Homart was to furnish its appraisal to the attorney for Hennepin County on the fifth day before the tax assessment hearing. On that day, Ho-mart sent its appraisal to the attorney by facsimile transmission. The appraisal was transmitted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Nelson v. SandkampSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Kugling v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Seifert v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
3Cited by28 opinions
- Amaral v. Saint Cloud HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- ILHC OF EAGAN, LLC v. County of DakotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Medica, Inc. v. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- BFW CO. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.