Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Koenig

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 2009No. A08-1209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BJORKMAN, Judge.

This case presents the question whether a driver operating a motor vehicle on a private driveway that crosses a state recreational trail is a “trail user” within the meaning of the rules governing state recreational trails. The district court determined that the trail rules do not apply, declined to instruct the jury in accord with the rules, and denied appellant’s motion for a new trial. We conclude that the trail rules do apply and reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTS

In June 2005, appellant Patrick Stewart and respondent Christopher Koenig collided in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Sandhofer v. Abbott-Northwestern HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. Zurko v. GilquistSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Wefel Ex Rel. Wefel v. NormanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. KoenigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. DOMAGALA v. RollandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API