Legal Opinion

All Metro Supply, Inc. v. Warner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 22, 2005No. A05-446PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges both the district court’s submission of an arbitration award to the arbitrator for clarification, and the court’s subsequent confirmation of the amended arbitration award, arguing that the district court exceeded its statutory authority under Minn.Stat. §§ 572.01 to .41 (2004). Because the statute does not permit submission to the arbitrator for clarification after the 20-day time limits set forth in Minn.Stat. § 572.16, subd. 3 (2004) have expired, and the district court was required to confirm the original arbitration award, we reverse and remand…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Family Insurance Group v. SchroedlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  2. Crosby-Ironton Federation of Teachers, Local 1325 v. Independent School District No. 182Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Menahga Education Ass'n v. Menahga Independent School District No. 821Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  4. International Union of Electrical & Machine Workers, Local No.1140 v. Portec, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. Eide v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mark Herll v. Auto-Owners Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
  2. State v. RitterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  3. In Re the Risk Level Determination of J.V.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Savinis v. Goldberg, Persky & White P.C., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County2006
  5. State v. RitterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API