Legal Opinion
Schiff v. Griffin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 12, 2002No. C9-01-1291PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge.
Appellants, candidates for council member in the Minneapolis primary election of September 11, 2001, challenge the district court order denying their petition for correction of ballot error, arguing that (1) they had standing by legislative conferral to seek judicial review of the alleged error; and (2) the phrases “DFL/Labor Endorsed” and “DFL-Endorsed” are lawful designations of political party or political principle under applicable election law. Respondent argues that appellants’ challenge is moot because the election is over. Although appellants’ claim is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Rukavina v. PawlentyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Builders Ass'n v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Nash v. WollanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Edina Community Lutheran Church v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.