Legal Opinion
In Re Cornish
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1997No. 95-BG-1830PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Per curiam
On December 4, 1995, the Court of Appeals of Maryland ordered that respondent 1 be placed on inactive status from the practice of law. Attorney Griev. Comm’n v. Cornish, 340 Md. 688, 667 A.2d 916 (1995). The Maryland court acted in response to a petition filed jointly by the Attorney Grievance Commission and the respondent. The petition stated, inter alia, that at the time, “a complaint was pending against Respondent concerning the handling of a patent application” 2 and that “Respondent admits that at the present time he is unable and has no desire to cope with the demands of the practice of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- In Re SamuelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re O'BrienDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re DickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re BowserDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In re StanleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re O'TooleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- In Re GlassDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In re PinckneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.