Legal Opinion

In Re Dick

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 10, 1996No. 95-BG-1386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The Court of Appeals of Maryland placed respondent on inactive status by consent af ter he acknowledged and submitted proof that he suffers from major depression. Before he is allowed to resume active status, he must petition the Court of Appeals of Maryland and be subject to an appropriate investigation to determine his fitness to practice law. We treat this action as one warranting reciprocal discipline. Hence, the functionally identical discipline imposed in Maryland— indefinite voluntary suspension with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness — may and should be imposed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re SamuelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. In Re O'BrienDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re CornishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  3. WinklerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API