Legal Opinion

In Re O'Brien

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 2, 1995No. 93-BG-1520PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

The Court of Appeals of Maryland placed respondent on inactive status by consent, respondent having acknowledged that “at the present time she is unable to cope with the demands of the practice of law.” We treat such an action as one warranting reciprocal discipline and that the functionally identical discipline — indefinite voluntary suspension with reinstatement conditioned upon a showing of fitness — may and should be imposed pursuant to D.C.Bar R. XI, § 13(e). In re Samuels, 648 A.2d 943 (D.C.1994). Accordingly, pursuant to the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re SamuelsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re CornishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re RoxboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. In Re DickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. In re ClancyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. In re NelsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API