Legal Opinion
In Re Glass
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 22, 2002No. 01-BG-1208PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
On August 29, 2001, the Court of Appeals of Maryland suspended respondent, Joseph E. Glass, from the practice of law for ninety days. Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Glass, 365 Md. 319, 778 A.2d 1107 (2001). That suspension was based on a joint petition in which respondent conceded the existence of sufficient evidence to establish that he committed assorted ethical violations in four separate matters. Those violations include charging an excessive fee, failing to provide the client with a written statement explaining the remittance to the client and the method of its determination,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re CornishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re HallalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In Re O'TooleDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005