Legal Opinion

In re Stanley

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 2001No. 99-BG-54PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

On December 14, 1998, the Court of Appeals of Maryland placed respondent, Denise R. Stanley, on inactive status by consent. At the time, respondent was facing three disciplinary complaints alleging that she failed to communicate with her clients on a timely basis. In the petition filed jointly with the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, respondent asserted that she was suffering from and being treated for depression that rendered her unable to provide adequate legal services to her clients.1

On February 8, 1999, this court temporarily suspended respondent pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, §…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In Re CornishDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re StanleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. In re McDonoughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. In re AlpertDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2026
  4. In re AngelosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. In re BostickDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API