Legal Opinion

Bell Community Redevelopment Agency v. Woosley

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1985No. Docket Nos. B003190, B003007PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for writ of mandate. Appellant Bell Community Redevelopment Agency sought to compel respondent Woosley, the Agency Secretary, to publish a notice inviting bids on the Agency’s bonds. We reverse the superior court denial and order the writ of mandate to issue.

A discussion of the issues raised by this appeal perforce begins with a brief discussion of redevelopment law. California’s redevelopment law was first passed in the 1950’s. The stated purpose is to present communities with a vehicle by which to eliminate the physical,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Torres v. City of Yorba LindaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. Craig v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. City of El Monte v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API