Bell Community Redevelopment Agency v. Woosley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HASTINGS, J.
This is an appeal from a denial of a petition for writ of mandate. Appellant Bell Community Redevelopment Agency sought to compel respondent Woosley, the Agency Secretary, to publish a notice inviting bids on the Agency’s bonds. We reverse the superior court denial and order the writ of mandate to issue.
A discussion of the issues raised by this appeal perforce begins with a brief discussion of redevelopment law. California’s redevelopment law was first passed in the 1950’s. The stated purpose is to present communities with a vehicle by which to eliminate the physical,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. SaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- In Re Redevelopment Plan for Bunker Hill v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Dinuba v. County of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Torres v. City of Yorba LindaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Craig v. City of PowayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of El Monte v. Commission on State MandatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.