Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. Saylor
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
This proceeding for writ of mandate is brought to test the constitutionality of the 1969 Health Facility Construction Loan Insurance Law. (Health & Saf. Code, ch. 4, pt. 1, div. 1.) As will appear, we conclude the law is constitutional and therefore the writ should issue.
Since 1879, article XVI, section 1, of the California Constitution has prohibited the Legislature from creating any “debt” or “liability” of the state in excess of $300,000 except by means of a bond law specifying the use of the funds passed by two-thirds of each house and approved by a majority of the voters.
At…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lundberg v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- City of San Francisco v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- People v. McCreeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Michael Sato v. Orange Cty. Dept. of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- People v. MendezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.