Santa Barbara County Taxpayers Ass'n v. County of Santa Barbara
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
Article XIII B of the California Constitution, also known as Proposition 4, limits the amount of tax revenues a government entity may spend. Section 5 states, in pertinent part: “Each entity of government may establish . . . retirement . . . funds .... Contributions to any such fund . . . shall . . . constitute appropriations subject to limitation . . -”
Here we conclude that the section means what it says, and that a county may not exclude from its annual appropriations contributions to its employees’ retirement fund.
Facts
Beginning in 1985, the County of Santa Barbara had…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- In Re Marriage of BouquetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Carman v. AlvordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. CousanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Weidenfeller v. Star & GarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Bolt v. Arapahoe County School District No. SixSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Hobbs v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.