Legal Opinion

Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. Martin

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1985No. L.A. 31861PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

This is a petition for writ of mandate to compel respondent Martin, Secretary of the Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency (the *104Agency), to publish an ordinance adopted by the Agency on August 24, 1982. The ordinance would allow the Agency to levy a sales and use tax. Martin refused to publish the ordinance on the ground that it assertedly violates section 4 of article XIII A, and article XIII B, of the California Constitution.

Redevelopment agencies are governed by the Community Redevelopment Law. (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.) As arms of local legislative bodies, they…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Los Angeles County Transportation Commission v. RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Mills v. County of TrinityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Redevelopment Agency v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Heckendorn v. City of San MarinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Davis v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API