Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency v. Martin
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
This is a petition for writ of mandate to compel respondent Martin, Secretary of the Huntington Park Redevelopment Agency (the *104Agency), to publish an ordinance adopted by the Agency on August 24, 1982. The ordinance would allow the Agency to levy a sales and use tax. Martin refused to publish the ordinance on the ground that it assertedly violates section 4 of article XIII A, and article XIII B, of the California Constitution.
Redevelopment agencies are governed by the Community Redevelopment Law. (Health & Saf. Code, § 33000 et seq.) As arms of local legislative bodies, they…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- City and County of San Francisco v. FarrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Los Angeles County Transportation Commission v. RichmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Mills v. County of TrinityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Redevelopment Agency v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- County of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Heckendorn v. City of San MarinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Davis v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.