Witter v. Bachman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County and from an order denying a new trial. V. A. Gregg, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Chipman, C.
T'his is an action to foreclose a contractor’s lien for certain work done upon the sidewalks in front of certain lots in the city of San Luis Obispo.
Plaintiff filed a complaint, and caused summons to issue, which was served upon defendant Sallie Zederman only. Plaintiff caused default to be entered against her *319by the clerk for not answering, whereupon her counsel moved to set aside the default. The court granted the motion. Plaintiff prepared a bill of exceptions to bring up this alleged error of the court. Much of his brief is devoted to a discussion of the law as to when a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dougherty v. HitchcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Himmelman v. DanosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Jennings v. Le BretonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Thompson v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Perine v. ErzgraberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Thompson v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Rutledge v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- San Diego Savings Bank v. GoodsellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- W. H. Marston Co. v. KochritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.