Legal Opinion

Rutledge v. City of Eureka

California Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1925No. Docket No. S.F. 10474PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

Ten complaints were filed by the plaintiffs and appellants in the superior court in and for the county of Humboldt to enjoin the respondent City of Eureka and its officers from issuing bonds to represent certain special assessments in a street improvement proceeding. The actions were consolidated and tried together. Findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of the defendants and respondents were signed and filed by the trial court and from a judgment entered in accordance therewith the plaintiffs have appealed. The record is presented pursuant to sections 953a et seq. of the Code of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Breeze v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Spring Street Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Pulcifer v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Knox v. City of OrlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Dawson v. Town of Los Altos HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Blake v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Estate of MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API