Perine v. Erzgraber
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Searls, C.
Action to recover a sum of money due upon a street assessment, and to foreclose the lien thereof upon a lot of land in the city and county of San Francisco.
Plaintiff had judgment, from which and from an order denying a motion for a new trial defendant appeals.
The proceedings alleged in the complaint were based upon the act of March 18, 1885 (Stats. 1885, p. 147), as amended by the act of March 14, 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 157).
The resolution of intention passed by the board of supervisors described the work intended to be ordered as follows:
“That granite curbs belaid on Locust avenue,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McDonald v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by13 opinions
- Williams v. BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- County of Riverside v. WhitlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Witter v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Reid v. ClayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Dowling v. ConniffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.