Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Johnson

California Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1882No. 7,206PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal by defendants, C. H Johnson and Mariana G. Day, from a judgment for plaintiffs and defendant Eymond, and from an order refusing to set aside said judgment in the First District Court of the County of San Luis Obispo. Fawcett, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

Appeal from a judgment and an order denying a motion. to set aside the judgment. The appeal from the order was not taken in time and is, therefore, dismissed.

It appears by the judgment roll that the action was commenced against five defendants to foreclose a mortgage. On the eighth of February, 1879, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint to which the defendants, Johnson and Day, interposed demurrers. Day’s demurrer was adjudged to be frivolous and overruled, and leave was denied her to answer. But, at the same time, Johnson’s demurrer was sustained, and the Court, by an order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGary v. PedrorenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. People ex rel. Rumsey v. WoodsThe Superior Court of New York City · 1849

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cole v. Roebling Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Reinhart v. LugoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Thompson v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hawthorne v. SiegelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Mott v. MottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API