Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Hyatt

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 25, 1988No. 1082PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

William hi Boyd, III (Boyd) owns and operates Standard Parts Co., Inc. Boyd brought this action against Kenneth Hyatt who owns and operates Ken Hyatt AMC-Jeep, Renault, Inc. for a court determination that he has a right of ingress and egress across a 25 foot wide paved strip of property in front of his store. Boyd sought damages for Hyatt’s obstruction of the paved strip and for an order requiring Hyatt to restore the strip to its former condition. Both parties appeal from an order finding Boyd has an easement over the strip, but Hyatt’s use of the strip was not unreasonable.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  2. Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Derby Heights, Inc. v. Gantt Water & Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  5. Marlow v. MarlowCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hoogenboom v. City of BeaufortCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  2. Helsel v. City of North Myrtle BeachSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Coker v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Nelums v. CousinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Town of Newfane v. WalkerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API