JKT Co., Inc. v. Hardwick
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The sole question we must decide in these appeals is whether a defendant who incurs attorneys’ fees and other expenses of litigation in the successful defense of a third-party’s claim may seek indemnification for these expenses against a codefendant who is found liable, even though the defendant would not have been entitled to indemnification if he had been found liable. We hold that such a defendant has no right of indemnification against his codefendant for these expenses of litigation.
The underlying case was a suit for damages by the plaintiff JKT Company, Inc., for a faulty roof on its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Addy v. BoltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
- Pender v. Skillcraft Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Stuck v. Pioneer Logging MacHinery, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- Bell v. Clinton Oil MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Griffin v. Van NormanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
- Scott v. Fruehauf CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Boyd v. HyattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.