Legal Opinion

JKT Co., Inc. v. Hardwick

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 10, 1984No. 0329PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole question we must decide in these appeals is whether a defendant who incurs attorneys’ fees and other expenses of litigation in the successful defense of a third-party’s claim may seek indemnification for these expenses against a codefendant who is found liable, even though the defendant would not have been entitled to indemnification if he had been found liable. We hold that such a defendant has no right of indemnification against his codefendant for these expenses of litigation.

The underlying case was a suit for damages by the plaintiff JKT Company, Inc., for a faulty roof on its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Addy v. BoltonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1971
  2. Pender v. Skillcraft Industries, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  3. JKT Co., Inc. v. HardwickSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Stuck v. Pioneer Logging MacHinery, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  5. Bell v. Clinton Oil MillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Town of Winnsboro v. Wiedeman-Singleton, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Griffin v. Van NormanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990
  4. Scott v. Fruehauf CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  5. Boyd v. HyattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API