Legal Opinion

Jowers v. Hornsby

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 8, 1987No. 22735PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harwell, Justice:

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in concluding that appellant failed to establish an easement by necessity across respondent’s land. We disagree with appellant and affirm the order of the trial court.

In 1983, appellant bought a piece of real estate in the town of Swansea. Since 1976, respondent had owned a piece of real estate which is located between appellant’s land and a thoroughfare called Spring Street. There is a dirt roadway which runs from Spring Street, across respondent’s land, and toward appellant’s lot. There was a dispute about whether or not this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  3. Steele v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1944
  4. Crosland v. RogersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1890
  5. Marlow v. MarlowCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Boyd v. BellSouth Telephone Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. All Saints Parish Waccamaw v. Protestant Episcopal Church in DioceseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. Smith v. Commissioners of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Slear v. HannaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API