Legal Opinion

Coker v. Cummings

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 18, 2008No. 4471PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONDUROS, J.:

In this boundary dispute case, James Coker appeals the master-in-equity’s grant of summary judgment in Respondents’ favor finding Coker had acquiesced to the boundary lines. We affirm.

FACTS

In 1985, Mott Fogle conveyed Lot 24 in the Smithville subdivision near Mount Pleasant to Jessie and Evelyn Gregg. However, in 1987 the Greggs conveyed the lot back to Fogle. In 1999, Fogle filed a suit regarding the boundary issue, which he later withdrew. In 2002, Coker purchased Lot 24 from Fogle. At the time Coker entered the contract to purchase the lot, he was unaware of a discrepancy…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Sauner v. Public Service AuthoritySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. Elam v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Jordan v. JudyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  2. State v. GarvinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. ABB, Inc. v. Integrated Recycling Group of SC, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2021
  4. Click Properties, LLC v. Thomas SC Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
  5. Davia Bunch v. USCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2026

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API