Helsel v. City of North Myrtle Beach
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Harwell, Justice:
Appellants-Respondents Charles F. Helsel, Judine B. Helsel, and Helsel Realty Company, Inc. (the Helsels) contend the trial judge erred in ruling that a street end was dedicated to the public. We affirm.
I. FACTS
The Helsels sought a declaratory judgment and an injunction prohibiting the City from exercising authority and control over a portion of a street end which provides public parking and access to the beach. The Helsels contend they possess exclusive parking rights on the section of the street end which borders their lot.
The street end originally was a portion of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chafee v. City of AikenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
- Blue Ridge Realty Co. v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965
- Chapman v. Greenville Chamber of CommerceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- OUTLAW v. MoiseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
- Boyd v. HyattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- Horry County v. LaychurSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Evins v. Richland County Historic Preservation CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Heritage Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Eagle Lake & Golf CondominiumsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
- MacK v. EdensCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.