Legal Opinion

Town of Newfane v. Walker

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 17, 1993No. 92-236PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

Defendant landowners appeal from a superior court order permanently enjoining them from interfering with the public’s use of the so-called Williamsville dam and swimming hole area and declaring that plaintiff Town owns the property in fee. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

This is one in a series of cases, and the second to be decided by this Court, involving the public’s right of access to and use of *224the Williamsville swimming hole. In Druke v. Town of Newfane, 137 Vt. 571, 409 A.2d 994 (1979), the Drukes sought to limit public access across their land to the swimming hole. We upheld the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Percival v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  2. County of Bennington v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
  3. Druke v. Town of NewfaneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Marksbury v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Boyd v. HyattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. KolodziejSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
  2. Town of South Hero v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 2006
  3. Brice Kirkland and Gordon Kirkland v. James Kolodziej and Barbara KolodziejSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. Gerlach v. Town of ChittendenVermont Superior Court · 2025
  5. John Gerlach and Debra Gerlach v. Town of ChittendenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API