Legal Opinion

Marlow v. Marlow

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 19, 1984No. 0279PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

This is an action instituted by appellant-Julia Marlow for an implied easement over property of respondent-John Mar-low. The trial judge denied Mrs. Marlow’s motion for a voluntary nonsuit or discontinuance and also refused to recognize she has an implied easement over an existing dirt road. Instead, the trial judge established a twenty-foot wide easement in the location designated by Mrs. Marlow which is the primary issue on appeal. We affirm.

Prior to March 22, 1978, the parties each owned an undivided one half interest in a 124.8 acre tract of land. On or about March 22, 1978,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Georgia Power Co. v. LeonardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Brasington v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927
  4. Forest Land Co. v. BLACKSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Abdalla v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  2. Smith v. Commissioners of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  3. Binkley v. Rabon Creek Watershed Conservation DistrictCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2001
  4. Boyd v. HyattCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Moore v. Berkeley CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API