Hill v. Allstate Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The only issue presented to this court is whether underinsured motorist coverage is available to an insured’s estate and next of kin on a wrongful death claim, where the insured’s policy limits are identical to those of the tortfeasor. For the reasons which follow, we answer such query in the negative, and affirm the court of appeals.
In order to determine whether or not appellant is entitled to underinsured coverage we must determine whether the accident involved an underinsured vehicle. In mandating underinsured motorist provisions in every automobile insurance policy, R.C. 3937.18(A)(2)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tomlinson v. SkolnikOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Wood v. ShepardOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- James v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. YobyOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hagen v. J. C. Penney Casualty InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of CompaniesOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Cole v. HollandOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1991
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.