Legal Opinion

Ross v. Farmers Insurance Group of Companies

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1998No. Nos. 97-402, 97-551, 97-2056 and 97-2301PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The question that has been certified for our consideration is as follows: “When does a cause of action for underinsured motorist coverage accrue so as to determine the law applicable to such a claim?” In the cases that are presently before us, the Montgomery County Court of Appeals held that Ross’s and Davis’s (hereinafter collectively “appellants”) rights to underinsured motorist coverage did not accrue until appellants had exhausted the tortfeasors’ available liability coverage. Because this condition precedent, i.e., settlement with the tortfeasor, occurred after the effective date of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gaines v. Preterm-Cleveland, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Martin v. Midwestern Group InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Kraly v. VannewkirkOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ady v. West American InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. Wolfe v. WolfeOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Moore v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hillyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Edith Lee-Lipstreu Edwin Lipstreu v. Chubb Group of Insurance Companies Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API