Legal Opinion

James v. Michigan Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1985No. 84-1167PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.

The sole issue raised by the instant case is whether the appellant, Michigan Mutual, is entitled to deduct, directly from the limits of its underinsured motorist coverage, the $12,500 paid to appellee Billy James by Globe American on behalf of Smith (an underinsured motorist). The appellant argues that it is entitled to such a deduction (or “setoff”) pursuant to R.C. 3937.181(C) and the terms of the appellee’s contract of insurance.

At the time of the appellee’s accident with Smith, R.C. 3937.181(C) provided: “The benefits provided under underinsured motorist coverages shall be subject to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gomolka v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Savoie v. Grange Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Bogan v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Littrell v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hill v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API