Cole v. Holland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The issue presented is whether a provider of underinsurance coverage may set off money received by its insured from a tortfeasor’s insurer against the insured party’s damages, or whether the setoff may be against the relevant policy limit.
Former R.C. 3937.18(A)(2) required “[ujnderinsured motorist coverage, which shall be in an amount of coverage equivalent to the automobile liability or motor vehicle liability coverage and shall provide protection for an insured against loss for bodily injury, sickness, or disease, including death, where the limits of coverage available for payment to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Nease v. Medical College HospitalsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- James v. Michigan Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Hill v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- In re Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Clark v. ScarpelliOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Littrell v. WigglesworthOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- Schaefer v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Ross v. Farmers Ins. Group of Cos.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
- State ex rel. McGinty v. Cleveland City School District BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.