Schneider v. Haas
Oregon Supreme Court
Multnomah County. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.
This is an action founded on a promissory-note. There was an issue of fact formed by the pleadings, and a jury empannelled to try the same. The bill of exceptions shows that at this point the court", on the application of the plaintiff’s attorney, made .an order excluding from the court room all of the witnesses of both plaintiff and defendants, during the examination of the witnesses and taking of the evidence; that at that time the plaintiff and both of the defendants were present in court, and the court inquired if both the defendants would testify, and being informed by the defendants’…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ryan v. CouchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Tift v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Crowe v. PetersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- Watts v. HollandTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Larue v. RussellIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. EdeOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- Bremner v. CharlesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Trotter v. Town of StaytonOregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Bremner Ex Rel. Bremner v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.