Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1972No. 101826, 101827PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

The defendant was convicted of sale and possession of dangerous drugs. OBS 475.100. The ques tion on appeal is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant a request for the exclusion of witnesses as authorized by OES 45.510.

When the case was called for trial, defense counsel requested all witnesses be excluded. During the brief discussion that followed, the prosecutor stated that most of his witnesses were police officers. Counsel for the defendant argued his client would be prejudiced by allowing the officers to remain:

“The only advantage for them being in the courtroom is to hear the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. KendrickOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. King v. MitchellOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Temple Enterprises, Inc. v. CombsOregon Supreme Court · 1940
  4. The People v. DixonIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  5. State v. EdeOregon Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CettoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Grace v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. State v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  4. State v. Van HooserCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  5. State v. HarristonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API