Legal Opinion

Bremner v. Charles

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1991No. CC 86-163; CA A45607; SC S37713, S37668, S37674PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUnis, J.

In this medical negligence case, we are asked to resolve two issues: first, whether the trial court erred in ordering a bifurcated trial on the issues of liability and damages; and, second, whether the trial court erred when it prohibited plaintiff Adam, a brain-damaged child who was then three years old, from being in the courtroom for a brief appearance during the liability phase of the trial.

Adam could not comprehend the proceedings, meaningfully participate in them, or assist his lawyers. He was represented by his mother as guardian ad litem. As Adam’s guardian ad litem and on her own…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Weiss v. NORTHWEST ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. In Re Richardson-Merrell, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  3. Morley v. SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, ETC.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gage v. BozarthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Vander Veer v. Toyota Motor DistributorsOregon Supreme Court · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Mainor v. NaultNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Green v. North Arundel Hospital Association, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. Reems Ex Rel. Reems v. St. Joseph's Hospital & Health CenterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API