Legal Opinion

Larue v. Russell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1866PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtFrazer, J.

This was an action of trespass, quare clausum foegit.

Answer, 1. General denial. 2. That the parties were joint tenants, and that the defendants entered the close by leave of the plaintiff. Reply, general denial. There was a jury trial at the August term, 1865, and a verdict for the *387defendants, and judgment on the verdict over a motion for a new trial.

W. Morrow, B. M. Goodwin and W. II. Hay, for appellant. A. C. Hanna, for appellees.

A bill of exceptions infonns us that “ the cause came on for trial upon the issues joined, whereupon the plaintiff offered divers witnesses to sustain his part of…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Holden v. LynnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Shew v. HewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Cottrell v. CottrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Brooks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Garman v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API