Crowe v. Peters
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court. cited : 4 Pet. 297 ; 6 Pet. 716; 12 Pet. 178 ; 2 Greenl. Ev., § 369, and notes ; 2 Kent Com. 240 ; Castle vs. Bader, 23 Cal. 75 ; Butler vs. Yiele, 44 Barb. 166 ; Funkhouser vs. How, 17 Mo. 225 ; Yan Deusen vs. Rowbly, 8 N. Y. [4 Seld.] 358 ; Lowe vs. Williamson, 1 Green Ch. 82 ; Grant vs. Thompson, 4 Conn. 203 ; Dewitt vs. Barley, 9 N. Y. [5 Seld.] 371; Dallam vs. Renshaw, 26 Mo. 583 ; Rumbolds vs. Parr, 51 Mo. 592 ; Henderson vs.…
Read the full summary
Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court. cited : 4 Pet. 297 ; 6 Pet. 716; 12 Pet. 178 ; 2 Greenl. Ev., § 369, and notes ; 2 Kent Com. 240 ; Castle vs. Bader, 23 Cal. 75 ; Butler vs. Yiele, 44 Barb. 166 ; Funkhouser vs. How, 17 Mo. 225 ; Yan Deusen vs. Rowbly, 8 N. Y. [4 Seld.] 358 ; Lowe vs. Williamson, 1 Green Ch. 82 ; Grant vs. Thompson, 4 Conn. 203 ; Dewitt vs. Barley, 9 N. Y. [5 Seld.] 371; Dallam vs. Renshaw, 26 Mo. 583 ; Rumbolds vs. Parr, 51 Mo. 592 ; Henderson vs. Henderson, 55 Mo. 534 ; Snow vs. Holstead, 1 Cal. 357 ; Sto. Eq. Jur., § 228 ; 1 Fonbl.Eq. B. l,.ch. 2, § 3 ; Bean vs. Valle, 2…
1Opinion of the CourtNapton, Judge
This case presents a series of questions, chiefly relating to points of practice, rules of pleading and forms of proceeding, which may be considered and determined without regard to the main question involved, and therefore needs no preliminary statement.
1. Adopting the historical order of exceptions noted in the record, the first point was raised upon the opening of the testimony by the plaintiff, that the second count in the petition staied no cause of action, and therefore no evidence should be permitted under that count.
The second count stated, in substance, that Erb, the deceased, was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mooney v. KennettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854
- Baldwin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
- Henderson v. DickeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1872
- Jones v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- McMillan v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1815
3Cited by23 opinions
- Stotler ex rel. Stotler v. Chicago & Alton Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1906
- Walker v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
- State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. HammelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Hammons v. EisertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Appleby v. BrockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.